People are not good and sometimes make mistakes. We take shortcuts, neglect methods to do things, or turn into distracted at occasions after we shouldn’t. In most facets of our lives, these aren’t things which have dire consequences. At work, however, surrounded by hazards, these types of errors can alter lives, even finish them. So, even though human beings are not excellent, we have to make our safety programs as close to perfect as we can.
PPE Focus: Face Shields
Personal protective equipment (PPE) is a side of safety where individuals are inclined to make many errors, and for a variety of reasons. Usually, we think that the mere wearing of PPE makes us immune to injury. With as much emphasis as we place on eye protection and head protection, can we lose sight (no pun meant) of protecting our faces? Certainly, eye protection is vital, since eye accidents can lead to permanent blindness. Equally essential is head protection, stopping fatal head injuries the very best that we can. Face accidents may not appear as significant a priority. They don’t have the quick, permanent, and potentially deadly consequences of the others. With that said, although, an employer’s accountability is to protect all parts of their employees, including their faces.
That accountability consists of figuring out tasks the place face shields needs to be used, providing face shields for workers to make use of, training them to make use of face shields correctly, and to correct staff when face shields are used incorrectly or not used at all. The primary elements are easy. Our workers will make mistakes. Correcting those mistakes and implementing your company’s face shield requirements is an essential a part of an effective PPE program. Unfortunately, too often, this facet of the PPE program shouldn’t be enforced until after an worker is injured.
Situations to Use Face Shields
Consider the following situations where face shields ought to have been used, and the results for the injured workers and their employers.
An worker was filling ammonia nurse tanks from a bulk plant. The employee was distracted while closing the valves, and mistakenly turned the wrong valve, causing a pressure release within the line. The discharge of anhydrous ammonia splashed on the employee’s face. The worker was hospitalized for chemical burns on and around the face.
An employee was putting in a water pipe at a multifamily residential development project. The worker initially was operating an excavator, then climbed down from the excavator to cut a ten-inch water pipe with a cut-off saw. The saw kicked back and struck the worker’s face. Co-workers called emergency companies, who transported the employee to the hospital. The employee was admitted to the hospital and handled for facial lacerations that extended from underneath the left eye to underneath the jaw.
Within the first situation, the worker suffered serious chemical burns. A face shield would have significantly reduced the chemical publicity, the extent of the chemical burns, and possibly might have prevented any ammonia from splashing on the employee’s face. Sure, the worker turned the incorrect valve, however does that imply that the employer is absolved of all accountability for this incident? Of course not. The actual fact remains that the employer ought to provide workers filling ammonia nurse tanks with face shields, train workers to use the face shields correctly, and require them to make use of them when performing this task. Then they have to regularly and constantly implement the face shield requirements. Doing so would have provided additional protection to the employee, even from the effects of the worker’s own actions.